How to Respond When a Journal Rejects Your Paper
Every researcher who has published has also been rejected. Nature rejects over 90% of submissions. Even good papers get rejected from journals that are not the right fit. Rejection is not a verdict on your science — it is information.
What matters is how you respond to it. This guide shows you how to turn rejection into a faster path to publication.
Step 1 — Wait 24 hours before reading the rejection email again
Rejection stings. Reading the editor's comments in that first hour rarely leads to clear thinking. Give yourself 24 hours, then read the feedback with the specific goal of finding what is useful — not what is wrong with the reviewer's opinion.
"Every rejection is a free review. Use it."
Step 2 — Identify the type of rejection
What to do: Check scope fit carefully. Read the aims and scope of your next target journal before submitting. A desk rejection from a top journal does not mean the paper is weak — it often means the topic is too specialised for that journal's audience.
What to do: Read every comment carefully. Address every single point before resubmitting elsewhere. Papers that are revised based on reviewer feedback are significantly more likely to be accepted at the next journal.
Step 3 — Extract every useful comment
Go through reviewer comments with a highlighter and mark everything that would genuinely improve the paper — even if the comment was harshly worded. Strip the tone, keep the substance. A reviewer who says "the methods are poorly described" is telling you something real, even if rudely.
Make a list of every change you will make and every comment you will address before the next submission.
Step 4 — Choose your next journal strategically
Do not just submit to the next journal on your list. Use the rejection to recalibrate. If reviewers said the study was too narrow, target a more specialised journal. If they said the clinical implications are not clear, target a journal with a more translational focus.
💡 Tip
When resubmitting to a new journal, you are not required to disclose the previous rejection. However, if the same reviewers happen to be assigned, they will recognise the paper. Having clearly addressed their previous comments — even if unrequested — will only strengthen your position.
Step 5 — Resubmit faster than you think you should
The most common mistake after rejection is waiting too long to resubmit. Papers sitting on desks do not get published. Revise, improve, and submit within two weeks if possible. Momentum matters in academic publishing.
Responding to reviewer comments?
Use the Scitero Reviewer Response Assistant to write professional point-by-point responses. Free, no sign up.
Open Tool →